27 Fortnights in a Year: Why PAYG Can Look Short in Australia (2025-26)
- Published
- March 2026
- Last reviewed
- Tax-year context
- 2025-26
- Reading time
- 3 min
General information only — we maintain pages with primary-source checks and date-based reviews. See editorial policy.
Check your fortnightly withholding
Enter your gross pay to see what is withheld from each fortnightly pay, and how a 27-fortnight year changes the annual picture.
Uses the ATO resident withholding schedule for that financial year.
Most people claim this from one employer
Includes HELP, VSL, SSL, ABSTUDY SSL and TSL debts reported to payroll.
Adds the official NAT 1004 extra amount for the selected tax year to every pay. Check your employer's payroll calendar before selecting this.
Enter your gross pay to calculate withholding
General information only. This is not tax or financial advice.
If you are paid fortnightly, some financial years can produce 27 pays instead of the usual 26. When that happens, the practical problem is not that the tax table is “wrong”. It is that the ordinary fortnightly table is built around a 26-pay year.
That can leave too little PAYG withheld across the full year, especially once the extra pay lands.
Why the extra pay matters
The ATO fortnightly tax table says that in some years you may have 27 pays instead of 26. Because the table is based on 26 pays, the extra pay can result in insufficient amounts being withheld.
That is why a fortnightly worker can finish the year with:
- payslips that looked normal all year
- PAYG withholding that still felt reasonable each fortnight
- but a year-end shortfall because the extra pay was not fully offset
What the ATO says to do
The ATO publishes an additional withholding table for 27-pay years. The published extra amounts are:
$12if fortnightly earnings are$1,700to$5,199$27if fortnightly earnings are$5,200to$7,249$48if fortnightly earnings are$7,250or more
This is not a new tax rate. It is a practical top-up to reduce the risk of a year-end shortfall. For the wider picture of how the ATO builds its withholding tables — and why doubling weekly tax never quite equals the fortnightly figure — see Weekly vs fortnightly tax tables: why they differ (2025-26).
Why employees often notice this late
The problem usually appears only after someone sees:
- an extra fortnightly pay in the calendar
- a payroll note about a 27th pay
- a larger-than-expected tax bill at lodgment
The extra pay does not automatically mean payroll made a mistake. It means the normal withholding assumptions may not line up with the real number of pays in that financial year.
What to check on your own payslip
If you think the 27th pay is the issue, check:
- Whether your employer has identified the year as a 27-pay year.
- Whether any extra withholding has been applied.
- Whether HELP or other study-loan withholding also applies.
- Whether this is your only job or one of several income sources.
If those settings are not right, the shortfall risk can be larger than the ATO’s base table suggests.
The practical decision
Use this rule:
- if you only need a quick employee-side check, compare the fortnightly amount against the ATO-style fortnightly tax table page
- if you need to test whether the withholding still looks light for your actual pay, use the PAYG Calculator
- if the real question is “what does this do to my take-home pay across the year?”, move to the Pay Calculator
Sources
Next step
If your concern is “why does the tax on my fortnightly pay still look short even though payroll is using the table?”, check whether this is a 27-pay year before assuming the withholding logic is broken.